Replies

I heard for the first time that General Ham was told that the rescue had already taken place.

This just came out in the report? It's news to me, I haven't had time to read any of it. When you say he was ready to storm the WH does that mean over Benghazi? I've never heard that either.

Clearly someone with greater authority than Ham (gee, only two people in the world, who could it possibly be?) sold Ham a lie about a rescue so he would ... wait for it ... stand down.

I've been saying since the beginning it was a set up to get everyone there killed but now I know it was a set up and I know 0bama ordered it. Panetta wouldn't have done that.

Numerous requests for added security denied.
Security scaled back from inadequate to less than inadequate.
Protocols for at-risk facilities by-passed.
F.E.S.T cut out of loop by WH.
Rescue force in Tripoli ordered to stand down.
Gen. Ham never receives 'go' order for forces ready to go at Sigonella, Aviano, Germany, Croatia and other bases with in-extremis forces.
(now we know it was more than that)
Standard Marine guard for diplomatic missions replaced by poorly funded British contractor and local Feb. 17th Martyrs Brigade with Al-Qaeda ties.

Some one set them up the Al-Qaeda bomb!

Hillary was in on it and it was planned weeks or months ahead of time.

Yeah, I’m pretty convinced the they were after Ham. But, I never knew that Ham was supposedly told the rescue had already taken place; and why wouldn’t he have checked on that ..?? Curious.

When Ham resigned, I knew it was over - not only Benghazi - but Ham’s comment about storming the WH.