Though there are a few exceptions, most liberals only present a false facade of intelligence. They place great weight upon things like Ivy League degrees, and speak in a highly pretentious manner, making sure to pepper their speech with constant pseudo-intellectual buzzwords. But press them to actually debate the objective facts of a particular issue, and you quickly discover there is no substance behind their conceit. Their only response to real intellectual discourse is to run to their "safe space" and attempt to marginalize their debate opponent via childish name-calling ("hater", "racist", etc.). This is their defense mechanism, and they use it constantly to avoid debate because they simply can't defend their positions.
What passes for intelligence with most liberals is nothing more than brainless regurgitation of leftist talking points and haughty derision of anyone who would dare to question their beliefs. They're really nothing more than parrots, mindlessly mimicking the bumper sticker slogans taught them by their professors, liberal media, etc. But man, what self-important, narcissistic little pric....um, parrots they are.
> What passes for intelligence with most liberals is nothing more than brainless regurgitation of leftist talking points and haughty derision of anyone who would dare to question their beliefs. They're really nothing more than parrots, mindlessly mimicking the bumper sticker slogans taught them by their professors, liberal media, etc. But man, what self-important, narcissistic little pric....um, parrots they are.
Bingo. Even parrots can learn "buzzwords".