[Fhios]

Your opinion. Mine is just as good.

This was an intentional act on the part of at least one officer with the cooperation of others. Shackle the prisoner up, toss him in the back and don’t buckle him in. Then take the ‘short cut’ for a little police dispensed pain. There intent may not have been to kill him, nonetheless that was the result of them abusing him.

There was a procedure introduced some weeks earlier that all prisoners had to be seat belted during travel. This was a result of 2 other lawsuits stemming from BPD joyriding prisoners. Whoever drove that car and shackled him up without seat should go to prison.

[digger48]

Except that your "opinion" has little basis in fact as has been presented at the 2 trials. The "rough ride" was only presented by the prosecution for the first time after the the judge disallowed them to use a hearsay comment by Porter.

The only evidence presented of a "rough ride" was rolling through a stop sign and crossing the center line at slow speed.

There was a procedure introduced some weeks earlier that all prisoners had to be seat belted during travel.

If you had followed Porters Trial, you would have seen that destroyed by the defense six ways from Sunday.

[safeasthebanks]

You have no idea what you are talking about and are making a total fool of yourself. Just thought you should know.

Oh, and everyone is laughing at you too.