Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Majority of Americans Support Congressional Earmark Ban, Poll Shows
The Daily Signal ^ | 6/9/2016 | Andrew Egger

Posted on 06/10/2016 5:36:56 AM PDT by milton23

A majority of Americans continue to support the congressional ban on earmarks instituted by former House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, a new Economist Group/YouGov poll shows.

The ban was supported by 63 percent of those polled, while 12 percent disapproved of the ban and 26 percent were not sure whether they approved or disapproved of it.

On principle, only 17 percent of respondents approved of the practice of earmarks and 59 percent said it is unacceptable.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysign.al ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: americans; conservatives; earmarks

1 posted on 06/10/2016 5:36:56 AM PDT by milton23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milton23

Interesting article history you have there.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:milton23/index?tab=articles


2 posted on 06/10/2016 5:58:29 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milton23

Define the term. Congress is the constitutional authority for how my tax dollars are spent.

Should we just skip the budget process and tell the executive branch “Spend the money any way you want”?

I say no.


3 posted on 06/10/2016 6:29:14 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper ((Just say no to HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milton23

The Gang of 535 should be in federal prison.

http://www.usdebtclock.org

CONgre$$


4 posted on 06/10/2016 6:38:34 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Define the term. Congress is the constitutional authority for how my tax dollars are spent.

Earmark definition: An earmark is a legislative (especially congressional) provision that directs approved funds to be spent on specific projects, or that directs specific exemptions from taxes or mandated fees.

Congressional spending should be for projects that benefit the US as a whole. Federal money should not be allocated by congressmen to the benefit of specific localities, or non-competitively-bid contracts to specific companies.

Open Secrets, list of earmarks, sorted by congressman. Click on the politician name to get his list of earmarks and who benefited.

5 posted on 06/10/2016 6:47:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Fine. If the Congress DIRECTS how the money should be spent, I have no problem.... this seems to be part of its delegated authority. The “general welfare” clause may apply.

What I totally disagree with, though, is giving bureaucrats a blank check to use the money however THEY see fit. At least Congresscritters can be voted out if they spend money foolishly. When bureaucrats have control, it is faceless.


6 posted on 06/10/2016 8:08:34 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper ((Just say no to HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson