Replies

I started reading Scot Adams blog some time back. He has interesting thoughts and reasoning...He is NOT a Trumpster and has that in plain sight on his blog...but he analyzes the Donald Vs. The Hillary.
He likes the Pursuasive aspects of Donald...Adams has background in advertizing and hypnosis which is basically mind control...
Intresting read...
What I have told anti Trumpsters in the past...This guy has a 50 year track record with all the 10’s of thousands of people he has worked with you dont find legions saying...”Donald Trump screwed me on a deal!”
It has not happened
Donald Trump has not left a body of “put some ice on it” behind him like the Clintons
Donald Trump has left no bodies in Fort Marcy park or anywhere else.
When Donald makes money he does it in areas where he has made it before not on futures which Hillary made a fortune in the one and only time she dabbled in it...
I vote for TRUMP!
Freegards
LEX

“When Donald makes money he does it in areas where he has made it before not on futures which Hillary made a fortune in the one and only time she dabbled in it...”

I can tell you (and anyone else reading this, of course) that Hillary was also ineligible to trade commodities at the time of the infamous cattle futures heist. I considered investing in futures at approximately the same time, and there were some pretty onerous financial conditions that had to be met before one could even open an account - such as having over $100,000.00 in LIQUID assets. She and Bill did NOT have that kind of money (well, not until after the transaction, anyway), so the whole thing was illegal.

What actually happened was that this was (obviously) an attempt to bribe then Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas. Well, they’re not so stupid as to have someone cut them a check, or hand them a suitcase full of cash - so they did it differently. They had some not-so-poor sucker who wanted to bribe him invest in 2 different accounts, invested in exactly the opposite way. Both were held in Hillary’s name (but, since the guy/company involved certainly had sufficient resources to invest, this presented no proble). One account did very well, and the transaction was closed and Hillary withdrew the money (and, to keep up the illusion of legality, reported it on their tax return). The other account was likely written off as a loss by the person/company involved - which Uncle Sam (i.e. all of us) helped to subsidize. Nice, isn’t it?

THIS is who we are dealing with - an utterly corrupt and self-interested person. Donald Trump would never do such a thing, and if he did somehow or other allow it, would likely have been prosecuted on multiple charges had he done so. But not the Witch or her philandering (very infrequent) consort.