Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: X-spurt

No, untrue. CO will have a primary election next year because Coloradans are unhappy with the caucus sham.

Blind voting at the precinct level is not voting. They used subterfuge methods to undermine any support not for Cruz.

The same party elite members screwed over Rick Santorum in 2012. Rick won, SURPRISE—>Mitt gets the delegates! They took any semblance of a real caucus out of the equation 2016 to prevent having to repeat their identical scheme of “voter rip-off” 4 years later.

Here’s the Colorado 2016 Caucus: Wink & choose Mr. Undeclared at your precinct, he will vote for Mr. Unknown to go to the convention, who in turn votes for Teb!


32 posted on 04/22/2016 6:23:36 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Do follow-up post replies pay the same as original posts? Sort of like lawyers get paid by the word?


33 posted on 04/22/2016 6:41:53 AM PDT by X-spurt (William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Do follow-up post replies pay the same as original posts? Sort of like lawyers get paid by the word?

How about addressing my points about this sham Trump propaganda poll?


34 posted on 04/22/2016 6:42:55 AM PDT by X-spurt (William of Ockham endorses Ted Cruz. 'the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson