Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK
Have you heard of thorium fueled reactors?

Much different story!

36 posted on 04/18/2016 5:52:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Have never felt an animus toward fission energy, and have reasons to believe a technology designed around molten salt would be a pragmatic way to enhance safety. Probably the waste reduction would achieve a practical 95% reduction of current reactor level and storage requirements reduced to 300 years.

Thorium doesn't fission but is a precursor to one flavor of uranium which does. Thorium(232)+neutron--->Thorium (233)β--->Protactinium(233)β--->Uranium(233)

51 posted on 04/19/2016 7:08:14 AM PDT by Ozark Tom (Political party: Union whose leadership sold out to a shell corporation and stuck you with the dues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Have you heard of thorium fueled reactors?

Thorium is not particularly energetic, so it would take a lot of it to make gobs of power. It is not an abundant substance. How long would supplies last? Probably not that long.

53 posted on 04/19/2016 7:50:25 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson