Here's the question to ask--- under the Clinton/Sanders doctrine, what manufacturer would be immune from being held responsible for the misuse of a product they legally made and sold?
Anyone, anyone?
Here’s the question to ask-— under the Clinton/Sanders doctrine, what manufacturer would be immune from being held responsible for the misuse of a product they legally made and sold?
Anything manufactured by a company owned by the Saudi’s
Colleges and universities could be considered a liberal-dominated “manufacturing industry”. I bet if someone graduates from an Ivy and embezzles a million or two, somehow it’s NOT the university’s fault!