Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434

A large part of that “unfavorable” consideration is coming from WOMEN, so it cannot be entirely due to “sexism”. Herself is just a very unlikable person, either from a distance (which Herself maintains very well), or for those unfortunate enough to be forced to be up close to Herself, the presence can be almost unbearable.

Shrill, to the point of making banshees almost good company, and with mental process that fluctuate between confusing and downright adversarial, it is difficult at best to get an accurate read on whatever political position Herself actually believes in. Is Herself a supporter of the Second Amendment, or not? The general consensus is, that Herself is a great admirer of the Australian scheme, which was simply outright confiscation, but then Herself comes out and says there is a right to own and keep arms, but only if there is a system in place to immediately trace ownership of any sidearm used in commission of any crime. In my mind, neither position is actually support for the Second Amendment.

And don’t even get started on amnesty, taxation policy, or the “social justice” agenda. On every one of these, Herself is over in a fever swamp somewhere, either by natural inclination, or because of the push that came from Bernie Sanders


23 posted on 04/18/2016 12:20:02 PM PDT by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

[[A large part of that “unfavorable” consideration is coming from WOMEN, so it cannot be entirely due to “sexism”]]

Only a very small % of the people oppose her for sexism- most people are fine with her beign a woman and running for president- just like with dear leader- only a very small % of people actually oppose him because ofskin color- when you have a huge body of peopel you are always going to have idiots that can’t get past race or sexism- there is nothing you can do to prevent it- but for her to paint everyone as sexist or him to paint everyone as racist is nothing but a gigantic whine job because it’s absolutely false

[[Herself is just a very unlikable person, ]]

And that in a nutshell is why peopel can’t stand either her or dear leader- they are very unlikeable people because of hgeir personlaities, and because of their hateful extremistl iberal views-

IF the GOP had any sense at all, every single time he or someone from his cabinet came on whining abotu racism should have come out and called him out for being a cry baby, and explaining to him and his ilk that race has absolutely nothing to do with their dislike of him- but rather it’s his extremist liberal ideology and whiny unwarranted victimization mentality that turn everyone off

The right ALLOWED the MSM and the left get away with painting everyone as sexist and racist, and homophobes, and that is why we are now seeing these people screaming about being victimized at every turn because now they know they can bully us by screaming racism, sexism, homophobia- just the mere mention of hte words now send the GOPe into full on panic mode


51 posted on 04/18/2016 3:02:55 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel

Women do not like to be led by other women; it is their nature to be led by a man.


52 posted on 04/18/2016 3:03:03 PM PDT by Dirt for sale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson