How many of you skirt the tax law by claiming every possible deduction and the a bit extra to not pay as much taxes? So now, what’s wrong with working within the rules to get every possible delegate? There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President. It ain’t in the constitution folks. Get over it!
You know, believe it or not, in the 60 years I have paid taxes, I have never once taken a deduction I was not entitled to and didn’t have paperwork to back it up.
Guess I just have a problem with dishonesty, no matter where it is.
How many of you skirt the tax law by claiming every possible deduction and the a bit extra to not pay as much taxes? So now, what’s wrong with working within the rules to get every possible delegate? There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President. It ain’t in the constitution folks. Get over it!
So the ends justify the means?
Cruz has aligned himself with the GOPe, #NeverTrump, the anti-Trump PACs and has the Bush Family behind him. The GOPe is using Cruz against the will of the people.
The GOPe is pulling out all the stops to stop Trump. They are using Cruz and Cruz is letting them. Cruz will be indebted to the GOPe, the PACs etc. should he become POTUS. Everything will remain the same.
One has to do with keeping the bloated government from getting my tax dollars, the other has to do with choosing the next President in as fair a manner as possible.
There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President. It ain’t in the constitution folks. Get over it.
You're right. There's no obligation. Good luck with that argument. Tell that to the GOP voters in the states involved, the vast majority of which, of course, are not party elites who grease the skids for the Establishment candidates to get delegates that they don't actually deserve.
Please climb to the highest mountaintop and proclaim your solidarity with the corrupt, entrenched GOPe crooks, and your embrace of their delegate selection process which doesn't reflect the will of the rank-and-file voters. That ought to help Ted Cruz greatly, as it already has.
Rules are rules, and corruption is corruption, and that's what's going on with the GOPe.
If you think GOP voters are going to hand the nomination over to someone who has jumped in bed with the GOPe in order to benefit from their crooked "rules", someone who couldn't beat the frontrunner fair and square, then you're headed for a rude awakening.
Ted Cruz has lost. He will have been mathematically eliminated after the next Tuesday or two. Ted Cruz's only hope is to get the nomination at a contested GOP convention, which would hopelessly splinter the party, and guarantee a GOP defeat in November.
Simply put, that's not going to happen.
This Tuesday night and next Tuesday night are going to be sweet...
You are actually comparing Slick Teddy’s gloating voter disenfranchisement to “skirting tax laws”. 1. Your argument is pathetic at best, and you probably think it is brilliant, which makes it hilarious. 2. Guess you forgot Cruz the Chicago thug apologist will be getting rid of the IRS day one if he is elected, but he will soon be rejected and hopefully unseated altogether. 3. Please refer to tagline. You are part of the problem.
“So now, what’s wrong with working within the rules to get every possible delegate? There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President. It ain’t in the constitution folks. Get over it!”
Get over it? How about you get it? The problem is not that the pervert Cruz is working the system; the problem is that the system is corrupt.
“There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President.”
In other words, unelected party bosses are a better option?
How many of you skirt the tax law by claiming every possible deduction and the a bit extra to not pay as much taxes? So now, what’s wrong with working within the rules to get every possible delegate? There is no obligation an any state to hold popular votes in primary elections for President. It ain’t in the constitution folks. Get over it!
++++++++++++++++++++++++
If it is not in the constitution to hold the popular vote then let’s just do the primaries in one hour every cycle. The party bosses elect their guy and we all save a lot of money.
Why not do it that way? It would be more honest.