BTW, this case you provided also states that NBC are defined in the Constitution.
Maybe you would like to look at the numerous links I provided to see what is said about the Constitution's meaning of NBC.
“Hmmm, Cruz isn’t Chinese......and he wasn’t born to two “non-citizens”.”
The fact that no person born abroad, except those under the protection of diplomatic immunity, lawfully acquired natural born citizenship has been an historical fact in England, the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and the United States for more than 700 years and longer. The mention of that historical fact in United State v. Wong Kim Ark has nothing to do with the defendants being Chinese or having two foreign parents. It was the same in other U.S. Supreme Court cases such as SCOTT v. SANDFORD, (1856: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”
“BTW, this case you provided also states that NBC are defined in the Constitution.”
No, and the Constitution has no authority to define a legal term of art from Natural Law.
“Maybe you would like to look at the numerous links I provided to see what is said about the Constitution’s meaning of NBC.”
I was given a writing assignment 52 years ago on the Presidential eligibility issue and Barry Goldwater during the 1964 Presidential election, and I have been studying the law on this question ever since. Suffice it to note, you have many years of research to go before you will come remotely close to teaching me or any other knowledgeable person something new about this eligibility question. It is only too painfully obvious you are clueless about the true meanings of the legal terms you are slinging around so ignorantly. If you think otherwise, then knock yourself out and cite the case law that established a child born abroad without diplomatic immunity acquired no U.S. citizenship at all.