My point is that if he lets this "fall through the cracks" it will rear its head later, just like Clinton. I found his response to be lawyerly and somewhat weak. What he said was the article was garbage and it was Trump's fault (not true).
[[ My point is that if he lets this “fall through the cracks” it will rear its head later,]]
By who? People who hate him anyways and hwo will raise it again EVEN IF he’s found not guilty? I’m sure he isn’t worried about those folks- nothing he says will ever satisfy their bloodlust
[[”Since I have been married, I have never had sex outside of my marriage, this article is completely wrong and I am working on a lawsuit to address this as we speak. These women do not deserve to be run through the ringer for these patent lies.”]]
Should he memorize this word for word in order to be declared innocent? Sorry for hte sarcasm- but as already pointed out nothing he says wil lbe accepted- you do realize people will simply accuse him of lying right?