> That is precisely why they enumerated to Congress the plenary power to codify the particulars of who does and who does NOT require a process of naturalization.
There is the error.
But no one on your side of this debate has ever been able to show that to be error. Even conservative Justice Thomas has said that those who are citizens at birth are natural born, because naturalization only applies to a change of status after birth. And he used the Naturalization Act as evidence. See the link in my previous post.
So this ability to address all questions of citizenship, including NBC status, by statute, is the truth and has been for centuries. Even in the British parliament, there was a long pattern of addressing natural born status of British subjects by statute. And those laws were called by the label of “naturalization,” just like their American counterpart.
So unless you have a way to rewrite history, you and yours need to do better than just issue empty denials. No rational person is going to be persuaded by such fluff.
Peace,
SR