Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bolobaby
They key is to use the offshore resources only to handle the "flow" until such time that it is clear it is becoming an ongoing operational expense, then switch to domestic FTEs. The majority of your organization should be FTEs.

It very often is not done that way.

53 posted on 03/02/2016 6:49:28 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (Trump fans:'he's no more conservative than Mitt'-www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3389209/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

Yep. A major company I *used* to work for actually only maintained an FTE staff of about 20%. The remaining staff was all contractors, including a large offshore contingent. We got the job done, but I prefer the model I have now where the ratio is reversed. Offshore is used for the quick augmentation on a temporary capital build. If that capital build improves the business, you end up hiring more.

As I indicated to a different poster, this model has resulted in me more than doubling my FTE staff in the past two years alone. It works and allows us to take more risks with capital projects. We don’t worry as much about trying something out that may fail. We’ll try 4x as many projects - the ones that win end up having a huge ROI which allows me to eventually hire more FTEs. The ones that were a waste didn’t cost us an arm and a leg.

Simple, really.


76 posted on 03/02/2016 7:26:29 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson