Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BereanBrain
Now that we agree that the Founders were not against Central Banks, because they created one in 1791, let's see if we can agree about EO 11110.

A 2010 article in Research magazine discussing various controversies surrounding the Federal Reserve stated that "the wildest accusation against the Fed is that it was involved in Kennedy's assassination."[17] Critics of the theory note that Kennedy called for and signed legislation phasing out Silver Certificates in favor of Federal Reserve Notes, thereby enhancing the power of the Federal Reserve; and that Executive Order 11110 was a technicality that only delegated existing presidential powers to the Secretary of the Treasury for administrative convenience during a period of transition.[17][18]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110

You may also notice that there is no mention of United States Notes in that "article" about EO 11110.

118 posted on 03/15/2016 10:52:49 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

But what did the treasury DO with their direction from EO 11110?
They printed sliver backed notes, bearing the device of “United States Note” not “Federal Reserve Note”.

Take for example, any other EO, that for example mentions activities of border control. No, Obama’s wording of the EO did not specifically say “catch and release” but that’s the outflow of the order.

Just as people read between the lines, so does the government write between the lines.


119 posted on 03/15/2016 10:59:23 AM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson