Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: azkathy

I’m sympathetic, but I want to know one thing.

If this assembly of ranchers had a purpose to educate and advocate for affected communities, then why was it necessary to occupy a federal building that had been closed down for the season?


12 posted on 02/27/2016 12:22:36 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

I believe they decided they had to bring attention to the plight of the ranchers, Dwight and Steven Hammond from Harney County Oregon. (They were illegally re-sentenced to additional jail time after serving their original sentences, AKA Double jeopardy for starting a back burn.)

There are literally hundreds if not thousands of these stories of Ranchers suffering under the heavy hands of these federal agencies with no recourse. I believe they thought an act of civil disobedience would educate and help bring to light all of the problems. They just didn’t think they would get killed for doing it.


14 posted on 02/27/2016 1:05:49 PM PST by azkathy (OBAMA IS WEARING OUT MY CAPS LOCK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson