Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: builder

You are not paying attention. If you are a “public figure” you have to prove actual malice when bringing a libel suit. If you are not a “public figure” then all you have to do is prove that the article was false, they knew it was false and it hurt your reputation. What Donald Trump is proposing that there be only one standard for libel, so that the libel laws are no respecters of person, i.e., that the libel laws apply equally to all persons. A very conservative idea in my opinion.

Here is hollywood’s analysis of the situation:
Absence of Malice
Paul Newman (Actor), Sally Field (Actor), Sydney Pollack (Director)


46 posted on 02/26/2016 9:07:29 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SubMareener
I think I am paying attention.
If Trump gets his way ,and he is a public figure and judge Alito is a public figure. Then when Trump said in the debate three times that Judge Alito signed the same bill that his sister did - then that was a knowingly false statement intended to harm.
Should he be successfully sued for that?
His proposed change in libel law would allow it.
84 posted on 02/26/2016 9:59:18 PM PST by builder (I don't want a piece of someone else's pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson