Actions have consequences. Character means willing to accept the full consequences of actions.
The GOP candidate or the Dem candidate is going to be the next President.
if you choose to attack Trump with no regard to how that effects the election and you want to make one of the central points to that argument that a candidate “lacks character” because he fights backs against those who attack him, like the Ricketts, then yes, people are going to question your motivations for your situational morality.
Perfect purity does not exist in politics. If by your actions, you enable a greater evil like Clinton, then yes, they moral base for your arugument has some gaping flaws.
See my own thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3401409/posts
I realize we are going to have to elect someone...and I am more than willing to vote for trump should he become the candidate...and it looks like he will.
That does not mean we cannot have reservations or ignore issues.
It just means we vote for the best person who can:
1) Help turn this nation around
2) Disallow the Presidency to progressive/liberal/socialists who will absolutely destroy the nation.
My point to you was the insinuation you made about Joanie, about as strong a conservative, patriotic American, and good Christian woman as you can find...that somehow she had compromised herself 100% for Hillary...when she had done no such thing.