Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackSeal
They have NEVER been asked to write a SIGEND copy of iOS that circumvents their security features until now for any phone.

They aren't asking for that... they just want in to this particular phone. In fact, wouldn't someone have to unlock this phone BEFORE being able to do an IOS update to install some back-door software?

41 posted on 02/22/2016 11:51:27 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Cementjungle

No. The one and only reason Apple can even attempt what the FBI is asking them is because you *can* load a new version of the firmware without a PIN when the phone is in DFU mode. Its a last ditch effort to rescue a bricked phone. If that didn’t exist they would have told the judge ‘sorry...cant help you’.

Again, what the FBI needs from Apple is a *valid* signed version of the firmware that they cannot replicate and, again, once they have that there is no more trusted encryption. To address the “but its only for this particular device” argument, it wouldnt be. After this new branched version of iOS is created it would be trivial for someone (ie - FBI, bad guys, good guys, gov’s) to apply this to any iPhone they wanted.


43 posted on 02/22/2016 12:07:50 PM PST by BlackSeal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Cementjungle

If you have ten locks that use a common key, then making one key opens all ten doors. The signed software circumventing the security protocols would not be limited to this one phone.


54 posted on 02/22/2016 1:18:05 PM PST by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson