The Supreme Court cannot repeal any part of the Constitution, they can make interpretations, but they cannot repeal any of it. There is a separate process that has nothing to do with the Supreme Court, right?
Now I see the RINO’s letting obama have his pick and I see the new leftist lineup on the SC very hard on our liberties, especially the 2nd Amendment, but the way this article approaches it is nonsensical.
“The Supreme Court cannot repeal any part of the Constitution, they can make interpretations, but they cannot repeal any of it. “
You’re obviously new to this.
Let me explain: The US Supreme Court doesn’t strike down clauses in the Constitution, it merely concludes they mean something different.