[Stanwood_Dave]

You misstate my answer to the question that was asked. In other words you shot your own foot off.

The question I was responding to (to keep it short) is Article 1 (one) more important [because it's Article 1] (Federal or State Constitution{s}) than (pick your poison / article that makes you feel warm & fuzzy) say article 10 (ten) or say article 16 (sixteen)or say Article 33.

Sorry, but your mixing Apple's (States Constitution{s} Which are in fact inferior to) and Oranges (The Federal Constitution.)

You do the research, courts have consistently held that the mere placement of a "Article" does not make it more or less important then other "Article(s)."

Not to worry, there have been many arguments based on this, but to my knowledge, none successful.

[Las Vegas Ron]

I responded to this post of yours:

Hate to pop your bubble, but in law; constitution(s) {State & Federal} are to be given equal station, i.e., one is not more superior / important, because of it’s place / location in said constitution(s).

That is patently false.

Are we mixed up on threads here or something?

[Las Vegas Ron]

Review the conversation on this thread, I think you got some wires crossed....it happens, no biggie.