Hmmmm, just curious here. I looked up Steve Deace and he IS is actually a little overweight, so I'll give you points there. He doesn't look like a "slob". Really, he looks like a pretty well dressed guy. As far as stupid is concerned, he seems to be pretty eloquent and well spoken. And, even if he were "stupid", even a "stupid" person might come up with a perl of wisdom every now and again that's worth reading.
In fact, his tag line sounds pretty conservative to me: "Fear God. Tell the Truth. Make Money. Rules For Patriots: How Conservatives Can Win Again." In fact, I guess I need to pay more attention to the "Make Money" thingy, myself.
All that said, can you please explain what his weight, grooming, or IQ has to do with the rest of your logical argument, or how it proves that the media is NOT being "soft on Trump"? It certainly does not de-legitimize anything that Deace wrote or Theo reposted.
Ya know, words mean things, and the way we construct our arguments tells folks a lot about ourselves. I'm a conservative by nature and by choice, so I fight illogical arguments. I particularly despise those that avail themselves of Alinsky's pernicious "Rules for Radicals" numbers 5 and 13. It just flicks a "switch" for me when I see a poster with many such pejorative posts in their history.
You can do better. Support him all you want, but Trump isn't worth the compromise of your conservative principles. FReegards.
I know Deace. He is kind of an overweight slob.
He has some slight impairment, sort of like very mild Tourette’s. It makes him seem weirder than he actually is.
Deace also has a monster ego, which makes him hard to like for a lot of people.