Posted on 02/16/2016 8:09:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
How familiar *are* you with the manosphere, before I answer you? It will determine the scope of my response.
You mean those male feminists? Not very? They think they are against feminism, but really they syupport it, whether they know it or not.
Suffice it to say many manospherians have given up on American / Western European woman as too influenced by feminism, and recommend that men wanting a wife go to parts of Brazil / Central America, or Eastern Europe, or the Philippines, to find women who are still socialized into traditional femininity...but *not* to bring the women back to the US lest they become corrupted.
Blank.............
That is about as chubby as I like.....
You do realize that's a joke, right? If they are so against feiminism, how come their ideology supports the feminist agenda 100% and gives feminists everything they want?
Face it, those red pill people pretend to be one thing, but they are just lapdogs to the feminist agenda.
I know all about the Red Pill concepts. It's all about low-testosterone wimps, who emasculate themselves while pretending to oppose feminsim. That about sums it up.
MGTOW could be said to, in a certain light, except it reduces the available supply of marriageable men. ("Where have all the good men gone?" and all that.)
But certainly not the others.
Obese, really?
She might not be a wait, but she looks perfectly normal to me.
Feminists are against: marriage, traditional Western values, family values, Religion (especially Christianity). And don't Red Pillites deliver all that?
Doesn’t MGTOW give the feminists what the wanted since the 60’s? It was practically invented by Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan.
Which is a huge feminist victory. They would like women to not want to get married, but they have never been able to accomplish that goal completely.
Secondly, there are a number of Red Pillers who are not PUAs: (Rollo Tomassi, Social Pathologist, Glenn Reynolds aka "Instapundit") and even some PUAs (RooshV) are beginning to publicly question whether sexual libertinism coupled with nihilism is satisfying. Return of Kings has had a number of guest posts by Catholic contributors.
While the overlords have been pressing for zero population growth, for Americans the birthrate is negative - that is the reason for trying to shame men into marriage. The white middle-aged childless women I work with really resent the Hispanic and black women for their families; those women are raising families, while the white ones are raising pets and plants.
Very interesting observation, KI2.
Are the women saying this because there is a dearth of husband material?
Good start to the day.
Thanks :)
C H U C K
Her angry pig face is a real turnoff.
Thanks; I don’t think the problem is a dearth of husband material, but the dearth of husbands willing to have children with them. Some wait years and years, finally getting married when the guy figures kids are out of the question biologically. Nowadays plenty of women earn more than guys (so the guys don’t fear alimony); they know the clincher is losing their children (and future earnings to child support).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.