The high watermark for him was NH with 37%.
I don’t see him breaking that number once all the way thru super Tuesday. With current field it could be enough to win in several places.
Look at the long game. Trumps negatives are too high.
Would we want to risk a high negative candidate against another high negative candidate in Clinton?
In that scenario it comes down to voting mechanics on election day and the D would win.
Too much at stake to risk that.
Again though, Trump is leading his opponents almost everywhere by double digits…those polls were verified by NH’s real voters across the spectrum. So any argument your making against Trump must then be applied two-fold to the rest of the field.