Skip to comments.
What if Trump spent nothing in New Hampshire?
Posted on 02/10/2016 5:13:29 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
He would have still won by 10 points. I don't this argument has been brought up.
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
To: ObamahatesPACoal
You’ve made an assertion.
What is your argument?
2
posted on
02/10/2016 5:16:13 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: ObamahatesPACoal
What if Trump didn’t even need to talk?
But could send out messages from his mind?
How many votes could he get then?
Wow!
3
posted on
02/10/2016 5:24:50 PM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: ObamahatesPACoal
He spent almost nothing in Iowa, and was a close second.
4
posted on
02/10/2016 5:26:02 PM PST
by
datura
(Proud Infidel)
To: ObamahatesPACoal
5
posted on
02/10/2016 5:28:36 PM PST
by
xzins
(Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: ifinnegan
6
posted on
02/10/2016 5:51:05 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: ifinnegan
What if Trump charged people $100 each to vote for him, and then donated the money to Bernie Sanders, just to prove that he could still win?
7
posted on
02/10/2016 6:02:51 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: SampleMan
8
posted on
02/10/2016 6:04:15 PM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson