A fundamental difference between our approaches to this issue is that I am willing to consult case law on the subject, and you are not. Case law even addresses the effect of the 1790 statute. At any rate, what you are railing against is not an axiom of mine, or an a priori assumption of mine. You are railing against the case law.
Does any case law specifically rule that a specific person was not a natural born citizen? I am unfamiliar with such a ruling.