Yes, you dance like an attorney.
In your post #40, you opined that "Once he drove off it was a felony evasion".
I replied to you that "Both of the women witnesses said he was gettiing shot at at the first stop."
You never replied. Did you miss that?
What do you, as an attorney, suggest Finicum should have done at that point?
Fished around in the back of the truck for a catcher's mitt and gotten out of the truck to "play" with the gentlemen who were "interested" in him?
I watched the video. The video supports that this was a good shoot. Eyewitness have a tendency to lie. Especially if they can be charged with a crime in regard to what they had witnessed.
There were witnesses that said that Michael Brown was just standing there holding his hands in the air when the cop just murdered him in cold blood. Lots of witnesses. All of whom lied or weren’t even there.
How reliable are these witnesses? Do they have ulterior motives for the statements they are making/ Does the objective visual evidence support their stories?
I don’t know. I wasn’t there. I don’t know these witnesses. I don’t know what the forensic evidence shows. But from this film, which appears to be unedited, it was a good shoot.
Now show me some “objective” evidence to refute it.
Do you know what “objective” is?