TRUMP'S PAST PRIVATE LIBERALISM VS REPUBLICAN TREACHERY IN OFFICE SINCE THE 1930s

EE | 29 JANUARY 2016 | EEE

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>In short, to be a good conservative Republican all you needed to do is talk about less government while wearing a shield of professed morality. American first hasn’t been an issue since Reagan.<<

---

That is just one great point out of a totally on-target post.

The conservative catechism is not even internally consistent, since it has often been accompanied by increased military spending and even social spending. Only the libertarians are somewhat consistent, and that leaves them as useful idiots for the globalists (i.e., weaken military, open borders, so-called Free Trade).

The GOPe NEVER puts America first, and neither does the NR crowd or, sadly, most of the 2016 candidates. They put the catechism first . . . FOR WHAT I ASK YOU!? What is the benefit of small government if it means LOSING AMERICA? This is INSANE.

[PeterPrinciple]

The conservative catechism is not even internally consistent,

---

It has been very evident even here on FR. The solution to every problem is government. “But our laws are better” I have been told even when you explain how those laws will be used against us. There is not much difference between liberals and conservatives, sorry to say.

I support Trump for the reason that it might be a gentler revolution than the other options. We are way past liberal and social issues. There is no fixing our current situation, sad to say.

NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL THE MONEY RUNS OUT. So, how does that happen? Hint: The USSR in recent history.

Folks, People disqualify Trump because he has been through several business bankruptcies. WELL, FOR THE RECORD, THE USA IS BANKRUPT AND WE NEED HIS SKILLS....................

[Lagmeister]

They put the catechism first

I like the way you worded it.

[Lagmeister]

OK TRUMP Fanboi here it is

What a bunch of word-swilling. Cruz's actions on TPA have been discussed in this forum endless times - just a sloppy wet kiss to Obama and another massive job loss for the country. Corker is also clear as it forced Cruz to give one of the most oblique political explanations I have ever heard. Both the aforementioned actions are clear examples of 'vote your corporate masters' while 'hiding your actions from the flock'.

[Pikachu_Dad]

Hmmm. Talk about loaded challenges.

Anyone who can post any transcripts or archives of Trump co-sponsoring, sponsoring, supporting thereof, participating in a Gang of 8 or 12, or signing any leftist policies while holding elective office capacity, I will immediately discontinue my support of him.

So as long as Trump was not in prior elective office you are supporting him?

[Albion Wilde]

the people who are supporting Trump - many of whom get belittled by National Review, Weekly Standard, HotAir, Townhall, and other Salem Communication-owned websites

Good catch! I see they are well-intentioned; but their mouthpieces lack wisdom in sliming and shaming those who aren't convinced that Cruz is the best way to restore respect for Christian values in the culture. If we go broke from a destroyed economy, lack of jobs, porous borders, corrupt politicians, bad trade deals and an anti-American fifth column disguised as refugees, there will be no Christian nation to defend.