And here we have the crux of the whole cult-like following of the (D)onald.
I didn’t go *anywhere*. The author tried to pump (D)onald by elevating his familial situation to some kind of paragon. I simply pointed out that (D)onald has had children by three women, and at least one of those children has been out of wedlock. This is not a family situation conservatives would typically admire, but the author GUSHES over (D)onald’s family like we should admire HIS over Obama’s.
Let’s be clear: Obama is an ass. Michelle is an ass. I’m certain their children will grow up to be bigger asses than Chelsea.
BUT...
Just because I disagree with them on almost every political matter does not mean that their *intact nuclear family* is somehow inferior to the (D)onald’s fragmented, multi-divorce, out-of-wedlock family from a conservative perspective. Until we have proof that Michelle is, in fact, a beard, then Obama’s family is a better model family than the (D)onald’s.
So, when you wrote...
“The insanity coming out of people to defend “their†candidate on here has reached a level I never thought I’d see on FR.”
...I must say that I wholeheartedly agree. You are exhibit #1.
First of all, nothing in my comment defended her article per say. But YOUR comment absolutely insinuated that somehow because Trump has been married numerous times and Obama has only been married once that somehow that makes Obama a better, more moral person than Trump.
I read her article. I don’t know this woman or whether she knows what she’s talking about but YOUR comment alone makes you sound completely irrational.
I’m not Exhibit #1 of anything! I’m not defending Trump I’m just stunned you would compare him to Obama. There isn’t anyone in the Republican presidential primary you can remotely compare to Obama, regardless of whether or not you like them or intend to vote for them.