Isn’t that the same court that said that unborn children (even up to the moment of birth) are not human beings?
Isn’t that the same court that just ruled that homosexual marriage is a fundamental Constitutional right?
You want those clowns to decide this issue?
Really?
Are you serious?
I agree that the two decisions referenced in your rely are repugnant and beyond comprehension. I am pro-life and believe that homosexuals should stay in the closet, with the door locked.
However, obama has publicly ridiculed SCOTUS at the State of the Union, and maybe they would like to have an opportunity to decide the NBC issue and let obama twist in the wind..he richly deserves it.
Remote, probably, but certainly plausible...
You're pro life?
Is there a candidate on the scene who is more pro life than Ted Cruz?
You honestly think the Supreme Court should decide this issue?
The 20th Amendment apparently gives that sole power to the electoral college and Congress and only after the electors are sent to the electoral college.
Where in the Constitution does it say that someone who might not be "eligible" or "qualified" is not entitled to run.
In fact, the 20th Amendment assumes that someone who is not qualified can make it all the way to the electoral college and become the president elect.
So the courts would have no Constitutional authority to even make a decision as to whether or not Cruz is qualified.
So who, in your mind should decide this issue?
The same court that has ruled that Abortion is a fundamental constitutional right as enshrined in the founders intent as any of the enumerated rights?
The same court that ruled that Homosexual marriage is a sacrosanct Constitutional right?
Again. Are you serious?