[AustinBill]

Yes, and it’s so good for you that it’s important that it never be labeled as such. We wouldn’t want Mr. and Mrs. consumer to get the idea that they can make their own decisions about what to eat, now. Eat up, children.

[Wolfie]

Yeah it’s fine. Just don’t make us label it.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Sounds fair enough, but try to get something reasonable through this “liberal” charged political situation today.

[Talisker]

Yes, and it's so good for you that it's important that it never be labeled as such. We wouldn't want Mr. and Mrs. consumer to get the idea that they can make their own decisions about what to eat, now. Eat up, children.

Exactly. What people don't realize is that what this is about is that the FDA has ruled that this GMO salmon doesn't have to be labels AS GMO salmon.

[ifinnegan]

“Yes, and it’s so good for you that it’s important that it never be labeled as such. We wouldn’t want Mr. and Mrs. consumer to get the idea that they can make their own decisions about what to eat, now. Eat up, children.”

This is the liberal left nanny-state view. The view that adds laws and regulations when unnecessary, usually for ulterior reasons, political or economic etc...

Non-GMO food producers can label their food as non-GMO.

If you don’t want to buy GM food, buy food that is not GM.

Problem solved.