[Twotone]

I suspect that our only recourse is to use our first amendment rights to ‘petition the government for redress of grievances.’ That means starting a movement to push back on refugee settlement within the states by contacting our representatives, & if necessary having protests in front of state houses. We should insist that Muslim refugees be sent to Muslim countries, not here. Islam is not compatible with western values of liberty and tolerance. Since Christians & other religious minorities are truly in danger in the Mid-East, they would present a different issue.

The response from the ACLJ was disappointing, but it really isn’t their bailiwick. We have to make our representatives understand that WE DO NOT WANT THESE PEOPLE HERE.

[Art in Idaho]

I suspect that our only recourse is to use our first amendment rights to 'petition the government for redress of grievances.' . . . Islam is not compatible with western values of liberty and tolerance.

If we can somehow 'petition the government for redress of grievances' in Federal Court and at least stay the implementation of the migration, then we could hold off until Jan, 2017.

BTW, from the other thread, where is the Refugee Processing Center in Your State?

Flood Of Migrants From The Muslim World May Be Coming To Baton Rouge, Lafayette And Metairie Has list of the 'infusion centers' for each state.

Full list is here: Refugee Processing Center Directory

[Pollster1]

I suspect that our only recourse is to use our first amendment rights to ‘petition the government for redress of grievances.

The First Amendment is clearly not our only recourse. Another amendment, one that follows shortly thereafter, may under appropriate circumstances provide the final and decisive recourse.