Posted on 11/04/2015 8:10:31 PM PST by Art in Idaho
Yes,
the difference must be noted.
Author mentioned Mike Vanderbough.
Why don’t you ask Great Britain that divided the area and installed the Hashemites to rule the COUNTRY called Jordan, a USA ally?
They also took a piece of Iraq and called it Kuwait. Was Saddam correct when he called Kuwait the Iraqi 19 th province?
We fought the first Gulf War to liberate the internationally recognized Kuwait, a USA ally.
Many examples of countries that were parts of the Ottoman and Roman empires, etc.
If you wish, you can get lost...in history, that is.
Iraq itself is just as arbitrary as anything mentioned.
Baghdad, Basra and Mosul areas were separate before Brits invented Iraq.
Absolutely.
The Brits made Egypt and Sudan one country that broke up in Nasser’s time.
The past is history and the present is reality.
Muslims in general also believe anything that happened before maximum Muslim expansion is just ancient history and bears no relation to the present.
Yes.
Some of them think that Spain is Arab!
I think those are excellent ideas. I've been racking my brain trying to think of a few. What about a "protect and defend" connection with seeing them as potential domestic terrorists and filing 'something' to at least put the whole thing on hold - demand a vetting process is in place, Homeland Security, blah, blah - file and tie it up in the courts so to speak - until Trump gets in. .
” They’re planning on a full bore importation from now until then,”
I have posted here for months that Obama will institute a Saddam-like “scortched earth” policy before he leaves office. He will attempt to flood our country with Muslim “refugees”.
These people in Idaho are merely using their common sense.
Obama will attempt to flood our country with Muslim "refugees".
That he will. Any ideas you have about how to legally stop this? Know of any attorneys who might look into this? Sent notes to Sekulow and Levin last evening. Nothing back yet. Is there a FReeper attorney ping list?
P.S. All FReepers, see the ideas from combat_boots above thread. Any other ideas on this? Let's all 'think on it' and see what we can come up with. Run it by attorneys you know. .
Will do, Art.
Is there not a legality issue pertaining to fraud? Passport, name, origin, organizational sponsorship, money carried, work visa, etc?
So which guy, Vanderbough or
Kerodin, now use the III% name? Or do they both use it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.