If you took the time, you would see I wrote "reportedly."
Now if you know something different, fine. I'm glad you added what you think is the situation.
In fact, his audience doesn't have to be shrinking, he may well just see a ripe opportunity to grow his audience.
More power to him - more revenue, more minds full of mush to convert.
If he's not in the bag for his golfing buddy, then he better know when to jump ship or he'll bring us all down by his "cleverness."
Ok you said “reportedly” re Limbaugh’s numbers. So now tell us WHERE you heard/saw this?
What was most interesting to me about yesterday’s show was a woman who called in gloating over the fact that GLAAD and lesbians had been able to accomplish what liberal men had been unable to do - the “dumbing down” and corrupting of our culture so that young people today no longer think that the US is “exceptional”. It was both disgusting and horrible!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/09/04/lady_of_the_left_gloats_on_gay_marriage
Hearsay from unnamed sources is exactly what Freepers deplore. It is foundational behavior for the corrupt politicized MSM and political class.
Here is an example of properly sourcing information key you your analysis. In this case, it does not appear to provide statistically significant support of your assertion relative to Rush's online audience which most likely follows his radio audience but I'll leave that for you to reseach and respond too.
https://www.quantcast.com/rushlimbaugh.com