And you know it...and many FReepers know it.
Want me to post it all again...I can.
Boot licker!
Most of this article was regurgitated from a biker blog. I don't really care how inaccurate it is. I did find this interesting, though
He said he thinks the Englishes were aware of the rift between the Cossacks and Bandidos and they were there that day as a show of support for the Bandidos.
I don't entirely believe this. I think the Englishes were there to hang out with their Bandido buddies. I don't think Mr English knew there was going to be a fight because nobody brings their wife to a brawl, much less a gun fight.
I am as frustrated as anybody with the slow (or non-existent) flow of information, but the tone of all of these threads has gotten out of hand. Any question of the most outlandish factually devoid statements gets one labeled as a troll or worse. Might as well be over at DU or #BlackLivesMatter for that kind of garbage.
One other thing that might be helpful for people when they are digging through the morass of this situation. Many have discounted the statements made by Cossacks. As a direct party to the incident, their statements should be taken with a grain of salt. That being said a lot of guilty parties tell the police a lot of totally truthful things, just not about their own particular actions. If a Cossack says he saw a Bandido shoot his buddy in the chest, that probably happened. That doesn't mean they weren't shooting at the same time. Just something to think about since they didn't say they were getting shot at by police.