No one is “crying” — which is an ad hominem, again.
And if you don’t like the original article (which I did not post) then don’t read it or comment.
You still haven’t refuted the facts or the photos, as they are true.
And also, please point out what is “crying” when one sites facts and avoids ad hominem attacks.
You are unhappy with “factoids” — but you admitted they are facts. So there is progress.
The photos are genuine(not “true”, and my point is, “So What?” Why does this ancient trivia bother you so much? I don’t think you know what “ad hominem” means, and you will never have the power to tell me what to read or to post. You seem to have some screws loose.