Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised, Not Lowered (contains many fascinating facts -golux)
via e-mail | Thursday, July 9, 2015 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 07/11/2015 9:54:21 AM PDT by golux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-556 next last
To: rockrr

Deovindickia!


161 posted on 07/11/2015 7:22:02 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

DioRealDeal ;’)


162 posted on 07/11/2015 7:27:09 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: golux; Sherman Logan; wideawake
Yeah, you know, it's just too dang bad the Slave Power wasn't satisfied in keeping slavery only where it already existed. But noooooooooooo, they had to repeal the Missouri Compromise and start forcing it on every state and territory in the Union regardless of the moral qualms of the locals (sound familiar)?

As wacko as the Left's narrative of the Civil War is, the Right's is just as crazy. Between the Communist co-option of the Union and the identification of the Confederacy with Nazi Germany (and the subsequent adoption of the Confederacy as the Conservative Republicans of their day) the actual history behind the Civil War is being banished to an Orwellian memory hole.

The Slave Power didn't believe in states' rights. They just grabbed that slogan once their conspiracy against the Free States failed and a non-extentionist was elected President. What a reason to leave the Union and start a war!

163 posted on 07/11/2015 7:34:43 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux; Sherman Logan; wideawake

I forgot to mention that Baldwin is one of those loathsome “palaeos.”


164 posted on 07/11/2015 7:36:20 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Paleo-loon?


165 posted on 07/11/2015 7:40:04 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I think it is reasonable to point out that the CSA had a key ideological issue in common with the Nazis. That is the idea that there is a Master Race and slave races.

While the two systems were very different, it’s not difficult to imagine the CSA, had it won, developing in a direction similar to that the Nazis later followed. Once you really believe in a Master Race ideology, a lot follows logically.


166 posted on 07/11/2015 7:52:45 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Now what rights are you saying citizens are being striped of?

How about each and every one of the individual rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution?

You can start with an easy one - the right to participate in the selection of the President of the United States. Not true at all. Look around you. We work, while Washington D.C. collects the fruits of our labor. The Civil war didn't abolish slavery, it just modified the demographics of it.

We are all slaves now. Sure the chains are more gilded, but do not mistake the fact that you have masters.

I suspect you're having trouble appreciating the reality of slavery, what it really meant to be owned by another human being. If you get to Heaven someday and meet some people who really were slaves, then you can swap stories with them about your life in chains. "And, they made me fill out a 1040 - every year!"

It's hard to imagine anyone saying the things you're saying. You've obviously had it too easy.

167 posted on 07/11/2015 10:45:57 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I don’t know how Lenin felt about slavery, but it’s going to be tough getting people to support reinstating slavery here. It’s over!


168 posted on 07/11/2015 10:47:58 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

lol - bttt


169 posted on 07/11/2015 10:51:27 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
Joan Osborne - What If God Was One Of Us
170 posted on 07/11/2015 10:52:55 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

Troll much, do you?

You apparently are the only Freeper foolish enough to believe or disingenuous enough to claim that anyone is advocating a return of slavery. But I suppose that pretending that others do is supposed to justify your own hostility to Southerners.


171 posted on 07/11/2015 10:57:48 PM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
You apparently are the only Freeper foolish enough to believe or disingenuous enough to claim that anyone is advocating a return of slavery. But I suppose that pretending that others do is supposed to justify your own hostility to Southerners.

Well, I know that the vast majority of Southerners agree with me about slavery. I know that the vast majority of Southerners are opposed to slavery and support the USA. I know that the vast majority of Southerners are grateful that Lincoln prevented a few Southerners from destroying their country and depriving their neighbors of their rights as United States citizens. Maybe you just don't appreciate how lucky you are to be an American.

172 posted on 07/11/2015 11:24:57 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

Great post. Thanks.


173 posted on 07/12/2015 12:16:18 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
The fact is, and it's supported by your article, is only a part of the legislature was arrested.

Oh well then, that makes it ok. /sarc

174 posted on 07/12/2015 5:16:17 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Oh well then, that makes it ok. /sarc

No, that makes it accurate. Accuracy being something that you and Chuck don't seem to have any interest in.

175 posted on 07/12/2015 5:42:27 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Walker Lewis and neither biographer even mentions a plot to arrest the Chief Justice. I had never even heard of the accusation until I wandered into the Civil War threads here. So you would have us believe that not one, but two biographers deliberately left such an important part of Taney's history out of their books?

I had not heard of it either (history is written by the winner) until 20 years ago when I heard the Ft McHenry Park Historian discuss famous prisoners and "almost prisoners." Since that time, I have heard several US Park/Battlefield historians discuss it as well.

But, having said that, you read a book one time that did not mention it, so I suppose you think that settles it.

On the suspension of habeus corpus, you cited the Constitution, but what you failed to cite was the Constitutional authority for Lincoln to suspend it. Chief Justice Taney ruled that Lincoln was ex-Constitutional in his arrest and imprisonment of Maryland legislator John Merryman, which is why Lincoln arranged for Taney's arrest. In 1866, the Supreme Court of the US ruled (again) that only Congress can suspend habeus corpus.

What you Lincoln worshippers fail to realize is that unless you worship Obama too, your inconsistencies are writ large. Obama's lawlessness is best paralleled by Lincoln's lawlessness.

If you are truly a conservative (which is very much in doubt), you would be first in line to denounce it if Obama imprisoned an elected official of a State, without charge and without trial.

If Texas were to take over border duties, and expel federal agents from their border with Mexico, and Obama sent federal troops to fire on said Texas officials, I hope a true conservative would not only be outraged, but defend the sovereign State of Texas. But, we know Federal sycophants who view the 19th century through the Progressive glasses of the John-Dewey-approved history books will never see how foolish they look calling themselves "conservative."
176 posted on 07/12/2015 5:51:55 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
history is written by the winner

Myths are written by the losers.

But, having said that, you read a book one time that did not mention it, so I suppose you think that settles it.

Two books by men who spent considerable time researching Chief Justice Taney and who wrote detailed accounts of his life and career and neither of which placed any credibility to your charge. You troll a couple of Reb websites and suddenly you're the expert.

On the suspension of habeus corpus, you cited the Constitution, but what you failed to cite was the Constitutional authority for Lincoln to suspend it.

Article I, Section 9 as I said. That clause does not say who had the authority to suspend it, and jurists as recent as William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O'Conner have said that whether or not the president can suspend habeas corpus has never definitively been decided.

Chief Justice Taney ruled that Lincoln was ex-Constitutional in his arrest and imprisonment of Maryland legislator John Merryman...

He was not a member of the legislature. Just the militia.

...which is why Lincoln arranged for Taney's arrest.

And yet Taney was never arrested.

In 1866, the Supreme Court of the US ruled (again) that only Congress can suspend habeus corpus.

Really? What case?

What you Lincoln worshippers fail to realize is that unless you worship Obama too, your inconsistencies are writ large. Obama's lawlessness is best paralleled by Lincoln's lawlessness.

And it's truly sad that you Lincoln haters can't see just how idiotic that statement is.

If you are truly a conservative (which is very much in doubt), you would be first in line to denounce it if Obama imprisoned an elected official of a State, without charge and without trial.

Now you're just being silly.

177 posted on 07/12/2015 6:05:47 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Really? What case?

Ex parte McCardle

But you will continue to raise the straw man, the faux conservative that you are.
178 posted on 07/12/2015 6:26:58 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I think it is reasonable to point out that the CSA had a key ideological issue in common with the Nazis. That is the idea that there is a Master Race and slave races.

While the two systems were very different, it’s not difficult to imagine the CSA, had it won, developing in a direction similar to that the Nazis later followed. Once you really believe in a Master Race ideology, a lot follows logically.

I think the real pull to the Axis would have been Latin Fascism and Japanese bushido.

But at any rate, the point of my posts is the utter hypocrisy of painting the Confederacy as a great defender of "states' rights" when it was born out of numerous violations of the rights of free states by the Slave Power. To pick the Confederate battle flag (actually the Confederate naval jack) as a symbol of "resistance to federal tyranny" nicely dovetails with the Left's narrative that the primary "right" conservatives want is to own and enslave Black people.

And btw . . . the so-called "League of the South" supports the Communist Celtic "national liberation movements" in the name of "Celtic solidarity." This means they excuse and defend the socialism and radical abortionist/homosexualist doctrines of those movements. Last year they adamantly supported the Scottish National Party and Scottish "independence" despite the fact that the SNP intended to make "independent" Scotland the first country on earth that enshrined "gay rights" in its fundamental law. I detest Black Americans' alliance with the Left, but how in the world can conservatives remain silent at such duplicitous hypocrisy by "palaeos" and neo-Confederates?

179 posted on 07/12/2015 6:41:14 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Your post:

Two members of the Free republic Taliban Army discussing their totalitarian politics in public. How nice.

180 posted on 07/12/2015 6:45:00 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-556 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson