Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook
Mario Apuzzo has had his *ss handed to him by me and many, many others on multiple occasions.

Not once. He kicks their @$$ over at Dr. Conspiracy every time he goes there.

And no where does John Marshall's court support your view.

In every case he ever dealt with pertaining to this issue.

This one for example.

Hey, I'm happy to let the Bingham part play out. In my prior post, I've already pre-empted your further attempts to misread Bingham.

Really? I must have missed that. What, do you have to have a secret decoder ring to find them or something? My recollection is you tried to dodge the point, but didn't make it.

I've put the Howard, Trumbull, and Wilson quotes in front of you before, only to have you brush them aside as if Bingham is the only person you will talk about. Howard and Trumbull are the draftsmen of the key provisions under debate, you lunkhead! You don't have to "wade through them." Just read them.

I'm not going to rely on what people in 1866 thought about something which was created in 1776, and who had been subjected to Rawle's consequent lying on the issue. I go to the founding era to understand founding era concepts. You want to play in the later half of the 19th century because there you can find people ignorant enough to agree with you, except for Bingham, of course.

This is why I have little patience with you. You are stuck nearly 100 years after the fact, and when many people had forgotten what the words meant. (Apparently not Bingham though.)

"Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen." Rep. Bingham, Cong. Globe, 40th Cong, 2nd Sess, p. 2212 (1869)"

Yeah, "of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty." Get it right @$$hole. Bingham wasn't as stupid as you.

140 posted on 07/09/2015 2:16:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
I'm not going to rely on what people in 1866 thought about something which was created in 1776

You want to rely on one (Bingham) when he says a few things that sound good to you. But when I show that that the draftsmen like Howard and Trumbull, and the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee explicity endorse a jus soli view to "natural born citizen," then you shift tack and pretend that "well, those guys don't matter."

You're an idiot talking about both sides of your mouth at the same time. Your inconsistencies make it so much fun to toy with you.

142 posted on 07/09/2015 2:23:30 PM PDT by CpnHook (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson