“ridiculed Cruz’s plan as politically unachievable”
Well then, since it is so “hard” to change the consititution in the appropriate manner, let’s just give that responsibility to 9 (or 5, or 1 depending on the view) rulers that wear black robes!
Isn't that as much an oxymoron as "same sex marriage."
He may once have been a "Conservative" Attorney; but undermining the foundational pillar of any Conservative society--that is the sanctification of the progression of generations in that society--is the total opposite of Conservatism.
“Conservative attorney and prominent gay rights activist”
I didn’t know sodomy and homosexual marriage were part of the Conservative agenda, I thought it was part of the liberal socialist agenda, once you get past what you do in the privacy of your home and bedroom with a consenting adult is your business.
What Olsen is saying is that the Supreme Court has no check or balance .. and when it rules .. we’re done!
WRONG .. the legislature can stop the wrong decision by passing legislation with a 2/3 vote which cancels the Supreme Court’s decision. Don’t people know this ..??
Just like when the President uses his VETO, the legislature can make that veto null and void by simply overriding the veto with a 2/3 vote.
This is what puts a limit on the power of each of the three branches of govt.
Sadly, there were not enough votes in Congress to stop the gay marriage fiasco.