I recall that case. It was about a non-violent felon. The case was actually quite clear.
The constitutional amendment clearly *violent* felons to be disarmed.
That is a reasonable precaution, as more and more “crimes” are being classified as felonies.
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/03/mo-court-enforces-constitutional.html
clearly *violent” should be clearly allows *violent*