Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyclone59

I recall that case. It was about a non-violent felon. The case was actually quite clear.

The constitutional amendment clearly *violent* felons to be disarmed.

That is a reasonable precaution, as more and more “crimes” are being classified as felonies.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/03/mo-court-enforces-constitutional.html


4 posted on 07/06/2015 6:41:11 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

clearly *violent” should be clearly allows *violent*


5 posted on 07/06/2015 6:42:29 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson