I that name supposed to mean something to me?
Okay, sounds like Trump, Cruz, Huckabee and Jindal are on the right side of this issue.
Where’s “I attended a gay marriage” Walker and the rest of the GOP field?
Okay, sounds like Trump, Cruz, Huckabee and Jindal are on the right side of this issue.
Where’s “I attended a gay marriage” Walker and the rest of the GOP field?
And yet, 4 days later, Trump has yet to come out from hiding under his bed and state an opinion, one way or the other, where the Unconstitutional ruling by the Supreme Court making Gay Marriage constitution is concerned.
Ted Cruz Ping! Why doesn’t he pick people who were strongly against gay marriage? Trump didn’t even say he was against it.
Ooo, Larry, you’re thuch a thavage.
Breitbart “got it”...and it’s why the leftwing communists could not allow him to continue.
I can throw lots of brickbats at Trump, but he might make a decent candidate for the US Senate or the New York governorship. He'd certainly be lots better than the Democrats who that state usually elects.
But what works in the DC-NY-Boston corridor doesn't work nationwide. People don't win races in Iowa, South Carolina, or even New Hampshire by running the way they do in New York, New Jersey, or Massachusetts.
The only good things I can see about Trump and Christie being in this race are 1) their brashness will make comments by hard-core conservatives seem less radical than they would be if Jeb Bush were the main moderate Republican running, and 2) Trump and Christie may well have the effect of dividing the GOP-e voters.
The GOP-e has done a great job in numerous elections of pitting numerous conservative candidates against each other, with the result that the least conservative major candidate comes out on top. Divide-and-conquer works. Doing a divide-and-conquer routine against the GOP-e could very well happen this year, and that's not a bad idea.