Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

First I am not sure all were “criminals”. There is no proof(that has been released) that all of those taken into custody were “criminals”. In fact the authorities have said the majority of them have no ‘criminal” record in Texas.

The one thing I find is a blatant violation of rights is the taking of property and disposing of it just on an accusation. Yes, I understand it is an old Texas tradition. Doesn’t make it right. Here in Nevada we push back on that and are winning the battle against property confiscation without court approval.


33 posted on 06/29/2015 10:32:47 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$

“First I am not sure all were “criminals””

Fair enough, I’ll call them “alleged criminals” then.

“The one thing I find is a blatant violation of rights is the taking of property and disposing of it just on an accusation.”

You’re talking about the vehicle forfeitures? If so, you can rest easy, they can’t be taken based only on an accusation:

“The actual process of forfeiture can only take place after a person is convicted of the crime alleged in the forfeiture.”

http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/Forfeiture-Motions-Filed-For-Cycles-Vehicles-Seized-At-Twin-Peaks-307981291.html


37 posted on 06/29/2015 11:18:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson