Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bone Texan

I’m not sure. What about all the fuel needed to get the combination of rocket AND plane to 50k? Is that really less fuel than getting a rocket alone to 50k feet? Are aircraft really THAT much more efficient at lifting payloads than rockets?


7 posted on 06/28/2015 6:29:36 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

Yes.

Instead of brut force to go up 9.5 miles (to 50,000ft.), you use the lift of air over a wing. You’re expense in fuel is for forward motion.


12 posted on 06/28/2015 7:16:46 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson