I agree, and yet you look on the left and you see defiance all the time.
I think too many republicans have been trained never to question the legitimacy of the from the courts. As if the whole system of Government depended upon obedience to the opinion of 5 unaccountable and un-elected tyrants in black robes.
Well its time for that to change We need to talk more and more about the corruption and inherit injustice of the Federal employees in black robes and their supposed power OVER the Federal Constitution to the exclusion of any check and balance.
We do that and you will slowly start to see a new kind of republican emerge not unlike that of the democrats that already nullify federal Edict although they never uses that term which is in fact part of our problem. Our people are failure with and trained in public schools to Condemn the basic terms of history but are nonetheless completely ignorant of the substance of that history.
Like the Confederate battle flag the name and symbol are familiar as the left have labeled them but the real history is generally unknown.(which is part of the reason the false label persist)
The point is we can still gain support for the cause if only we avoid the demonized symbols. Particularly if we come up with some other cause more popular around which to rally and justify.
Our real problem is we work with reason which while accurate and effective a weapon in achieving physical results as a political weapon it does not have the power of emotion to encorage people to take the risks require to stand up to the Federal employees in black robes.
Right.
Just as theft is a nice handy shortcut to riches. Those who play by the rules cannot compete with those who don’t. That doesn’t mean I want to stoop to their level. It means I think they are slimeballs and not worth the time of day. We should stop engaging with cheaters and liars. What is the point? I don’t care what they think. It will all change tomorrow anyway. They are slimy snakes.
The left depends upon the Right to obey the laws, because the Right usually does, while the left does not.
If things were ever really left to the left, we would rapidly turn to anarchy and economic ruin.
The problem with that is that there is no limit to what the Left will demonize. Their ways are subtle to the uninitiated.
I think it is no accident that the movie Glory was resurrected recently, before the shooting in Charleston. I fully expected another round of Redtails and Roots for 'Juneteenth', and maybe even Amistad but all that wasn't so obvious (I don't watch BET).
Any truly violent and racist whacko would be incensed, and the general sheeple prepped for sympathy for his victims.
Note, on the issue of homosexual 'marriage', how one who watches prime-time TV has been increasingly bombarded with the presence of characters who are 'out' or 'partners' shopping for homes or doing remodels. It is at the point where such shows are no longer watched in our home because of the inevitable faggotry. Not even networks with commercials showing homosexual (lesbian) kisses.
The preparatory bombardment of the population with the media blitz in every venue from 'news' of alleged wrongs to the target group, hate crimes, and the companion sitcoms and dramas to promote the agenda du jour. At times the next punch is telegraphed by the sitcom and other scripts on TV.
Our real problem is we work with reason which while accurate and effective a weapon in achieving physical results as a political weapon it does not have the power of emotion to encorage people to take the risks require to stand up to the Federal employees in black robes.
To think that there is no emotional aspect to the revulsion toward homosexuality in general (despite the attempts at desensitization), nor the attempt to ban the Confederate Battle Flag would be in error. Both elicit strong emotional reactions in ordinarily polite people.
Perhaps the problem isn't the lack of emotion, but the absence of dramatic displays thereof, including the violent and illegal lengths to which those promoting the causes of eliminating historical banners or defying nature are blatantly willing to go. Let us not ever underestimate the contribution to evil causes of the complicit media.
The only way to reach them is through the wallet--their sponsors. While a boycott may not be 100% effective, I will not patronize any sponsor of such media. If enough people do likewise, and inform the sponsors why, perhaps the drop in sales or shift of market share will get through.