To: Sir Napsalot
2 posted on
06/26/2015 6:31:04 AM PDT by
biggredd1
To: Sir Napsalot
2 of the 3 Branches of government appear to be completely out of the game.
3 posted on
06/26/2015 6:31:17 AM PDT by
ryan71
(Bibles, Beans and Bullets)
To: Sir Napsalot
4 posted on
06/26/2015 6:32:48 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Sir Napsalot
>>>>
..... because this rule is now what Chief Justice Roberts says it is. No need for more theatrical heated debates or grand standings on any future legislations, immigration, trade, etc.
What is the point?
5 posted on
06/26/2015 6:32:48 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
Here is a thought exercise for discussion - Suppose Congress were to pass a separate act and override Obama’s veto that specifically prohibits the government from giving subsidies to those states that had not set up exchanges.
What happens then?
To: Sir Napsalot
John Roberts is simply a writer
7 posted on
06/26/2015 6:34:44 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
To: Sir Napsalot
===> immigration, trade, marriage, etc.
8 posted on
06/26/2015 6:34:45 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
an Exchange established by the State. that's an odd sounding phrase to my American ears. We don't have a "state"; we have several states. Was the bill written by Frenchmen or Germans?
10 posted on
06/26/2015 6:37:07 AM PDT by
Oratam
To: Sir Napsalot
(end excerpt)
Perhaps the least credible part of the Chiefs opinion is the false judicial modesty in his closing. In a democracy, the power to make the law rests with those chosen by the people. Our role is more confinedto say what the law is, he writes, citing Marbury v. Madison. That is easier in some cases than in others. But in every case we must respect the role of the Legislature, and take care not to undo what it has done. By that, Chief Justice John Marshall meant interpret the law, not rewrite it.
Emphasis mine.
12 posted on
06/26/2015 6:39:31 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
This ruling makes perfect sense given today’s “pretend to be anything you want” world.
16 posted on
06/26/2015 6:47:08 AM PDT by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: Sir Napsalot
There is dirt on this turd. He is an assclown and nothing but!!!
17 posted on
06/26/2015 6:48:48 AM PDT by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: Sir Napsalot
Well, what I want to know is what did George Walker Bush know and when did he know it.
18 posted on
06/26/2015 6:50:49 AM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
To: Sir Napsalot
20 posted on
06/26/2015 6:53:24 AM PDT by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
To: Sir Napsalot
Can you imagine a case heard by the USSC where it was argued that the "right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon" by the state, was determined not to be the intent of the legislation as it was written?
We've got some crazy power drunk loons sitting in tens of thousands fat nests feathered with our tax dollars in Washington, DC.
22 posted on
06/26/2015 6:54:23 AM PDT by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: Sir Napsalot
"Calling the balls and strikes"
John Roberts was clearly lying through his teeth during the senate hearings.
The rot in this country is deeper than anyone thought.
Same sex marriage just passed also.
26 posted on
06/26/2015 7:01:05 AM PDT by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington.)
To: Sir Napsalot
It’s time for some comprehensive judicial reform. These black-robed tyrants are wielding power against the American people that they were never meant to have. FUSCROTUS!!!
28 posted on
06/26/2015 7:22:31 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Zippity Doo Dah, Zippity Ay! Yeeeeee Haw!!!!!)
To: Sir Napsalot; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
34 posted on
06/29/2015 6:15:46 AM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson