Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GreyHoundSailor
Are truthful comments on policy, in the course of a political discussion, personally contemptuous? Good luck proving that.

I don't think proving it would be a problem. A statement like "The problem is Obama has no heart. He is a loser. I think he’s a coward..." is contemptuous on its face. It is not a comment on specifics of policy, it is plainly a contemptuous statement about the character of the man himself. I would be very surprised if MG Vallely wouldn't readily admit that his purpose was to express contempt.
57 posted on 06/23/2015 2:42:08 PM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: armydoc

Then kindly cite one example where a retired military officer has been returned to active duty in order to be court-martialed for violation of UCMJ Article 88. There’s only one I could find and it was dropped pdq because the politicians didn’t want to give the individual involved a larger platform.
You’re also confusing ‘contempt’ with ‘personally contemptuous’, which is a requirement for prosecution under the UCMJ. It’s never been defined either.


64 posted on 06/23/2015 4:36:31 PM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson