Your “question” was ad hominum (and not original). It does not look good for you to deny it or play innocent after such an unfair and intellectually dishonest attack/evasion.
I appreciate what she is saying, and especially appreciate that she now is a lot more outspoken on pro-life matters.
She is talented and smart.
As a Californian I think that she ought to have run this time for Boxer’s seat.
That she isn’t, but moved to DC to become enmeshed in RNC national politics is indicative that she is not a serious candidate.
iCarly is a pseudo-candidate meant to support the RNC and act as buffer against any conservative insurgency. she is not the only one.
There is nothing wrong with that, especially if one supports the RNC establishment over conservatives.
Or maybe she knows she is the only one who can criticize Hillary because she has the requisite body parts to be allowed to. Maybe she intends to help the Conservative cause regardless of if she wins the nomination or not.
I have as much insight into her motives as you do, so my assertion is as valid as yours.
You need to look up the word ad hominum. In fact, it wsa a valid question as you demonstrate a strong dislike for her for some reason, it is a fair assumption.
but moved to DC to become enmeshed in RNC national politics is indicative that she is not a serious candidate.
That is your opinion and you're welcome to it, it hardy makes her a mole or a hack like you have accused her of being, without proof I might add.