Posted on 05/22/2015 4:39:50 PM PDT by SatinDoll
I don't think the world will rise up against us .... the world is pretty sick and tired of their blood thirsty, inhuman leeching asses
There's not a nation on earth (including Russia) that hasn't been cowed by the fear of muzzie hurt feelings, and normal men would just shoot their asses and be done with it
It was already noted in another thread that Syria is salivating over the fact they are getting closer and closer to Israel.
Isaiah 17:1 - “Woe to Damascus; it has been taken away from being a city, it has become a ruinous heap.”
When this happens, I will not be surprised.
Bookmarked
I have said since 1983 that the only ways to fight Islam are either go total war and slaughter them, or Crack down and put them in a surveillance state where enforcement of Sharia Law is lethaly and without exception countered.
One or the other, and every other course is planning to fail.
øbama ecstatic.
I studied Bible Prophecy for over 10 years, and I believe Shoebat is correct.
Revelation 20:4 speaks of Christians being beheaded...muslims are the ones beheading today so yeah I can see IS winning.
Nuclear war, but first, Obama wants to even the sides.
Mostly he wants the United States on Islam’s side, and I believe that the major reason for that is so that the United States will share in Israel’ inevitable thermonuclear retaliation.
If a war of anhilation against Israel comes under the left, the San Fernando Valley is the very last place to be. Not sure where other US targets would be, but that breadbasket is a given.
Two countries are fighting for the right to reate the next Caliphate. Iran and Iraq. ISIS is the radical wing of the Ba’ath party.
What Iran is facing is a slaughter of Shia by ISIS. Iran thought they had Syria and Lebanon locked up but forgot that Hezbollah cannot beat ISIS on the battlefield and more importantly, that Assad threw his lot in wth Iraq in 2003. Which means both Assad and ISIS are killing opposition.
Question then becomes, just why does Obama want Iran to have a bomb?
I've been thinking lately about how often they refer to "The Crusaders" in their various propagandas and justifications.
I don't know what the Crusaders actually did to them, but it damn sure stuck!
This column is worth reading through to the end, as the whole picture makes frightening sense. I wish it didn’t.
THE FIRST CRUSADERS threw them out of Europe!
The second Crusade needs to expand upon that tto include ALL Infidel Nations on the globe!!!
While it is probably the case that the Daesh is benefiting from the presence of some Iraqi ex-Ba’athists in their ranks, you seem to ignore the fact they are fighting against a Ba’athist government is Syria and to ignore the fact that any Islamist ideology is antithetical to Ba’athism.
Ba’athism was, and is, a fascist version of secular Arab nationalism, which is why Arab Christians in the Middle East outside of Lebanon, if they are involved in politics at all, are almost to a man Ba’athists. In both Iraq and Syria the Ba’athist governments were amalgams of the religious minorities — in Syrian mostly Alawites, but with a smattering of ordinary Shi’ites, Christians and Druze; in Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Sunni with some Christians (Tariq Aziz, the former Ba’athist Foreign Minister is a Chaldean Uniate).
Correction - Obama will lose to ISIS.
No. The First Crusade pushed the Muslims out of the Holy Land and some parts of Eastern Anatolia. The Muslim foothold in Spain, which was their only presence in Europe at the time, was unaffected. All of the subsequent Crusades against the Muslims were generally ineffective attempts to stabilize, extend, or retake what the First Crusade had done, and the only fighting they did in Europe was against fellow Christians.
Two words...Valerie Jarrett. Obama is just the puppet. She pulls the strings.
“While it is probably the case that the Daesh is benefiting from the presence of some Iraqi ex-Ba’athists in their ranks, you seem to ignore the fact they are fighting against a Ba’athist government is Syria and to ignore the fact that any Islamist ideology is antithetical to Ba’athism.”
Are they? It seems like both ISIS and Assad are fighting against rebel groups supported by Obama, Hezbollah and anyone who isn’t a radical. Syria could send aircraft to bomb ISIS positions but they aren’t. They could mass an army to destroy ISIS but they aren’t.
There has to be a reason why.
We’re not allowed to use the word “crusade”. Remember W was using it and they stopped because it hurt the muslims’ feelings?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.