Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Okay, so that is $0.002196 per gallon. I don’t understand where the common refrain comes from that desalinization plants are not cost effective. Was repayment of the $500 million factored into the Israeli price? Even if not, over the life of the plant, I doubt the cost is prohibitive.


11 posted on 05/10/2015 4:44:39 PM PDT by Reno89519 (For every illegal or H1B with a job, there's an American without one. Muslim = Nazi = Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

“Okay, so that is $0.002196 per gallon. I don’t understand where the common refrain comes from that desalinization plants are not cost effective.”

At the quoted price it would cost CA about $3,000 per acre to water their crops.


13 posted on 05/10/2015 4:54:13 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

Here is why it is prohibitive. Water is freedom. If people have clean water, they have an opportunity to create economies. Economies create wealth and innovation. Wealth and innovation create solutions to the worlds problems. Can’t have that in a utopian paradise.

Take all the money given to the UN each year and build desalination plants along the African coast and you eliminate global hunger and poverty. Unfortunately to the commies, that cannot happen. Building desalination plants removes any water from the ocean that would cause massive flooding as well as green large swaths of land which will eat CO2 and produce oxygen.


15 posted on 05/10/2015 4:56:55 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (two if by van, one if by broom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson