Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: timlilje; rockrr; Ditto; Huck
Lincoln didn’t give a hoot about slavery. If he did than why did he wait 1 1/2 years AFTER the Civil war started to give his Emancipation Proclamation?

You have a time table for things that you think are necessary, desirable, and attainable. Some things seem possible, others impossible. Events may change circumstances and what was once impossible may become possible or even necessary to achieving other goals.

And better to say "America didn't give a hoot about slavery" (in the sense of slavery being morally wrong or something that had to be eliminated). Lincoln was certainly out in front of most of his fellow countrymen on that.

MONEY was always the reason. Free labor=Cheaper textiles!! The South was eating the North’s lunch when it came to manufacturing. MONEY was always the reason. Free labor=Cheaper textiles!! The South was eating the North’s lunch when it came to manufacturing.

That is so wrong, I don't even know where to begin.

82 posted on 04/21/2015 2:17:43 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: x
"...That is so wrong, I don't even know where to begin..."

After I responded, I just made the assumption that I must have completely missed the point he was making. I didn't know where to begin.

98 posted on 04/21/2015 2:29:09 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson